James E. Talmage and April 6th

There is a tradition among Latter-day Saints that Jesus Christ was born on April 6th. Everyone seems to believe it, but nobody seems to know why. In my super humble opinion it is complete bunk, and hopefully over time the tradition will fade. For more on this Mormon myth see here.

Elder James E. Talmage* was very influential in the establishment of this tradition. In this blog post, though, I’m going to suggest that Talmage later changed his mind about Christ’s birthday. In 1915 he wrote the following in his enormously popular book “Jesus the Christ”:

As to the season of the year in which Christ was born, there is among the learned as great a diversity of opinion as that relating to the year itself. It is claimed by many Biblical scholars that December 25th, the day celebrated in Christendom as Christmas, cannot be the correct date. We believe April 6th to be the birthday of Jesus Christ as indicated in a revelation of the present dispensation already cited [D&C 20:1], in which that day is made without qualification the completion of the one thousand eight hundred and thirtieth year since the coming of the Lord in the flesh. This acceptance is admittedly based on faith in modern revelation, and in no wise is set forth as the result of chronological research or analysis. We believe that Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem of Judea, April 6, B.C. 1. (Talmage, “Jesus the Christ”, 1915, pp. 98)

As you can see, Talmage dates Christ’s birth to April 6th. The occasion for this blog post is a quote that I recently discovered while researching an unrelated topic. In 1931 Elder James E. Talmage delivered an address entitled “The Earth and Man” which was later published as a pamphlet under the authorization and direction of the First Presidency (a fascinating story in itself). Here is the relevant quote from that talk:

If the Usher chronology be correct, or even approximately so, then the beginning of Adamic history as recorded in scripture dates back about 4000 years before the birth of Christ. We as a Church believe that the current reckoning of time from the birth of Christ to the present is correct, namely 1931 years — not from last New Year’s day, January 1, but from the month that came to be known among the Hebrews as Nisan or Ahib, corresponding with our late March and early April. So we believe that we are now living in the 1931st year since the birth of Christ, and therefore 5931 years since the beginning of the Adamic record.

In case you didn’t catch it, Talmage places Christ’s birth somewhere in “late March [or] early April” based on those months’ correlation with the Hebrew calendar. No longer is Talmage assertively stating that “we believe” in a specific birthdate for Christ. I believe that if Talmage still thought Christ was born on April 6th he would have said as much on this occasion. This isn’t a silver bullet, but it would appear that sixteen years after writing “Jesus the Christ” Elder Talmage was no longer so sure about the exact date of Christ’s birth.

The implications? It might not be possible for proponents of the April 6th myth to appeal to James Talmage anymore.

*By the way, Elder James E. Talmage is one of my very favorite historical Latter-day Saints. Being a geologist myself (as was Talmage), and following his legacy in regard to science and Mormonism, I have great respect for that Apostle.

This entry was posted in ..

6 comments on “James E. Talmage and April 6th

  1. gundek says:

    April may not be so far off. I have to find an old notebook that lays out the calculations but based on the dates that the Zechariah and the rest of the division of Abijah would have been serving in the Temple. By fixing the date of the second temples destruction and the the division of Jehoiarib being the last division of priests to serve in a temple, Its all speculation but a late April date fits in the realm of possibilities.

  2. Gunlock Bill says:

    I think you are reading into it something that isn’t there.

    “but from the MONTH that came to be known among the Hebrews as Nisan or Ahib, corresponding with our late March and early April.”

    He is talking about the “month” of Christ’s birth, not the day of it.

  3. maclouie says:

    I agree with Gunlock.

  4. James says:


    I think I see what you are saying, but it seems to me that Talmage would have taken this opportunity to reaffirm the April 6th date that 16 years earlier he had so confidently stated was what “we believe”. Because he didn’t reaffirm it I am hypothesizing that he may not have held that view anymore.

    The way I read it, Talmage is placing Jesus’ birth sometime in the Jewish month of Nisan. Nisan lies in March-April. So, it would appear that Talmage accepts the possibility that Jesus was born in March.

    But, as I mentioned in the body of the post, it isn’t a “silver bullet”. I’m definitely not trying to say that this is a totally unambiguous statement.


  5. srm220 says:

    People think that the date of the official formation of the Church hints at the april 6 date. What do you think about that reasoning?

  6. James says:

    Hi srm220. That is precisely the reason this Mormon myth got started. It is a rubbish.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s